RON PLANT:
When I read the 4000+ word article that David Baines wrote
Vancouver SUN, questioning the ‘FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP’ of the Rick Hansen
Foundation, it raised a few questions for me.
1.How many months has this man
devoted to this story, and what was his motivation?
2.Why, of all the prospective
targets to finger point, would you choose this topic for your swan song? Enjoy
your retirement, Mr. Baines.
3.What business is it of David
Baines, how the Rick Hansen Foundation is run, or what compensation Rick Hansen
receives?
In my opinion, if Baines is afforded months to conspire and
craft his… ummm… complaint, exposé, or whatever it is, shouldn’t the folks at
the Rick Hansen Foundation be given some time to respond? That is IF they feel
the need to respond at all. Why is it that after a cursory read through of one
reporter’s article, some members of the public (many of whom have never read a
financial statement in their lives) start throwing around words like fraud, and
demanding explanations? Rick Hansen doesn’t owe me any explanation, and I dare
say he likely doesn’t owe you one either.
To me, Rick Hansen is a man who has made huge strides in
affecting public perception of persons with disabilities. He has given hope to
generations of persons with spinal cord injuries and related disorders through
significant, ongoing research fundraising efforts, and has shown a spirit of
determination in the face of adversity well beyond what the average person has.
You ever roll around the world in a wheelchair? Me neither.
If I have any point to make here at all, it is simply: Don’t
rush to judgment. Even at 4,000 words, David Baines hasn’t given us all the
facts, nor do we have any feedback from the foundation. Or does that not matter
in the court of public opinion?